Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IFRs on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Differences in Minimum Allowable Stresses in ASME B31.3 for Low and High Pressure

Jun 26, 2024
2
While working on an inspection procedure for process piping in drilling units, I noticed an interesting detail in the ASME B31.3 code. This standard separates low-pressure and high-pressure systems into different chapters.

A key point in this process is the calculation of minimum required thickness, which depends on the minimum allowable stress of the material. These values are listed in the code:

  • Table A-1: For low-pressure systems.
  • Table K-1: For high-pressure systems.
However, when checking Table K-1, I saw that for the same material and temperature, the minimum allowable stress values are different from those in Table A-1. This raises questions about the reasons for these differences and how they affect material selection and calculations.

Have you come across this in your work? Share your thoughts in the comments!
 
Its not a low pressure vs high pressure thing, "High Pressure Fluid Service" is a special service designation (vs "Normal Fluid Service", "Category D Fluid Service", etc.) that triggers additional requirements and different allowables. There is no specific pressure that triggers this, it is an owner driven service designation.

It has to do with the thin wall behavior assumption that drives standard code stress calcs starting to not be as applicable at certain pressure levels and wall thicknesses. It is explained pretty well in the text of the code IIRC.
 
Its not a low pressure vs high pressure thing, "High Pressure Fluid Service" is a special service designation (vs "Normal Fluid Service", "Category D Fluid Service", etc.) that triggers additional requirements and different allowables. There is no specific pressure that triggers this, it is an owner driven service designation.

It has to do with the thin wall behavior assumption that drives standard code stress calcs starting to not be as applicable at certain pressure levels and wall thicknesses. It is explained pretty well in the text of the code IIRC.
Thanks
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor