Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

dimension decimal points/commas

Status
Not open for further replies.

ctopher

Mechanical
Jan 9, 2003
17,446
I do alot of dwgs for military (US & Europe) and the question came up about use of points vs commas. I have always known for inches, use points. For metric use commas. Somewhere I have seen this in writing, but do not remember where. There are plenty of specs that have pics of dwgs with points used everywhere, rarely commas ... unles it is a European dwg. Does anyone know where I can find (IN WRITING)about the use of points/commas? When/where they are used? thank you
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Oy. In the U.S. and UK the standard is to use a period (. aka "full stop"), both for metric and inch units. This is shown throughout ANSI drawing standards. In most of the rest of Europe, the standard is to use a comma for the radix, and I think that the ISO drawing standard specifies this (I don't have a copy of the ISO standard, but the comma convention is followed in ISO 5167 (2003) which I do have a copy of). But, not always when you are talking about their money (examples Germany and Finland).

Like the difference in 3rd angle projections, I can see this one being a good thing to define in a title block, if there is possibility of users from both sides of the pond (or channel?) using it. An example could be 1/10 = 0.1 (or 1/10 = 0,1). Or, if you can confirm that the ISO standard specifies it, just specifying the drawing standard may be sufficient (it is for the ANSI standard).
 
Why we need to specify it? The dimension numbers are "self-explanatory".
At our plant we work with drawings from both sides of the pond, we never had any problems with commas/periods.
 
With some military/aerospace customers, it has been brought up. Somewhere there is a spec on it. I know here in the U.S., it's no big deal because at a lot of companies most drafting standards/specs are not followed anyway.
 
Um, why specify a drawing standard? So you have a leg to stand on when your vendor screws up and makes the parts wrong. Why specify which decimal system you use? I guess if you don't mind getting your 1.000 inch part delivered as a 1,000 inch part (and having to pay for it), then don't worry about it. I think the decimal standard (American convention) is covered sufficiently by specifying the drawing standard (ANSI 14.5M).
 
I don't need to specify a standard. I just need to show in writing about when/where points/commas are used. Some customers want commas, others don't care (I don't care either way). I just need to show a spec in writing the proof.
 
Well the standards do cover it if you really understand them. Metric dimensions are not allowed to show trailing zero's to get a tighter tolerance. 1,000 on a metric drawing would be 1mm.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
"Fixed in the next release" should replace "Product First" as the PTC slogan.

Ben Loosli
CAD/CAM System Analyst
Ingersoll-Rand
 
I can read them and understand most of them. I just can't find the wording about points/commas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor