Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Direct Flame Strip Heater

Status
Not open for further replies.

vacguy

Mechanical
May 13, 2002
4
Good Morning All-

We are a manufacturer of industrial heating equipment, mostly metallurgical heat treating furnaces.

We build a small furnace for a customer that uses two ribbon-type burners mounted in a small enclosure that is used to heat an area measuring 6-8" wide by 60" long on a sheet of 1/8" mild steel plate. The burners are located above and below the steel being heated and are rated at 900,000 Btuh each (1.8 million total). They produce a sheet of flame down their length that impinges directly on the steel sheet.

We have a total of 45 seconds to heat the steel. Using the burners at their rated input, we can achieve a temperature of around 1550F in that amount of time.

During testing, we overdrove the burners to almost 3,000,000 total (something we don't want to do in production)and were able to get to 1700F in the 45 sec. Doubling he input only gained us around 150F.

I think what was happening is that the flame temperature of the (stoichiometric) natural gas flame was staying essentially the same at the higher input, so the delta T between the flame and the work was staying the same. All we were doing is changing the film coefficient at the surface with the higher velocity flame. Most of the added heat was just going up the flue.

Our customer is happy with the current performance at the rated input of the burners, however, he has an application that requires that the steel temperature reaches 1800F in the same 45 seconds, still using natural gas.

Apologies for the length of the post, but does anyone have any suggestions as to how to get to 1800?

TIA,
Rich R.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You nearly quadrupled the gas flow, presumably, but it's unclear to me that you've added enough, or any, air to really get the fuel to burn efficiently at the point of use.

One would think that given the drastic increase in gas flow, you'd need a correspondingly drastic increase in air flow into the furnace.

TTFN

FAQ731-376
 
Sorry, I should have mentioned that the combustion system was kept on ratio (stoichiometric) during all of the test runs.
--RR
 
Random thoughts here. With oxy fuel, the temperature is hotter.

But there is still the radiant heat transfer rate that is limiting or the heat escaping rate is higher. would better insulation or more reflective surface area on the oven.

How about the portion of the flame the plate steel is in contact with. At higher rates the plate may be in a colder portion of the flame. You may need to move flames.

 
How sure are you that you have stoichiometry? I would fiddle with that, at least, just to make sure.

Have you considered piping in pure oxygen? You're supposedly going to get a 500ºC boost running pure O2, although, standard methane is supposed to have about 2200-K flame temp, which is close to 3500ºF.



TTFN

FAQ731-376
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor