audacious1234
Aerospace
- Aug 4, 2008
- 9
Hello,
I have a composite panel (AL core 1.89" and AL face sheet 0.032" bonded with BMS 5-101, Type I, Grade 10) to be used on attendant partition with a 2 disbondings between core and face sheet. The disbonding size is 2” X 9” one away from edge and other disbonding of similar size near edge of the panel. I searched on Boeing SRM and chapter 51-70 gives me repair procedure for large damage but the problem is per this repair procedure I will have to replace skin with a gauge thicker doubler. But that will create an offset (0.08”) on panel surface which won’t allow me to install attendant seat on it. Supplier is claiming that we can use injection repair method for voids which will allow us to repair it. But the problem is there is no standard procedure (Boeing SRM or FAA approved) which will allow us to approve this repair. Can someone recommend/ guide me to a standard procedure which allows repair without adding gauge thicker doubler? I am doing the substantiation by testing so I have to make sure the production unit is stronger or equivalent to test article after void repairs. Or is there any analysis method by which I can show the repair is stronger or equivalent to test article. Test article didn’t have any voids in it.
Thanks
I have a composite panel (AL core 1.89" and AL face sheet 0.032" bonded with BMS 5-101, Type I, Grade 10) to be used on attendant partition with a 2 disbondings between core and face sheet. The disbonding size is 2” X 9” one away from edge and other disbonding of similar size near edge of the panel. I searched on Boeing SRM and chapter 51-70 gives me repair procedure for large damage but the problem is per this repair procedure I will have to replace skin with a gauge thicker doubler. But that will create an offset (0.08”) on panel surface which won’t allow me to install attendant seat on it. Supplier is claiming that we can use injection repair method for voids which will allow us to repair it. But the problem is there is no standard procedure (Boeing SRM or FAA approved) which will allow us to approve this repair. Can someone recommend/ guide me to a standard procedure which allows repair without adding gauge thicker doubler? I am doing the substantiation by testing so I have to make sure the production unit is stronger or equivalent to test article after void repairs. Or is there any analysis method by which I can show the repair is stronger or equivalent to test article. Test article didn’t have any voids in it.
Thanks