Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Distance sensor for diameter compensation

Status
Not open for further replies.

lukin1977

Mechanical
Jan 19, 2009
397
We have in operation one re-spooler machine to wind welding mig wire on 15 kg plastic spools

The machine consists on a un-winder, a dancer unit and a winder

As the unwinder gives wire to the winder the diameter of the wire coil decrease. To compensate the diameter reduction there is installed a sensor (see picture attached)

The sensor is very old and it was custom made for it. I am not sure what kind of sensor is, but I am guessing is an ultrasonic sensor

The signal from the sensor is unstable (it varies +/- 1V ) while the coil is spinning and this is making the speed syncronism between winder and unwinder to become unstable too
My first thought was that the problem was a signal interference through the cables so I made a few measurements and the signal is coming unstable from the sensor it self

Is an ultrasonic distance sensor good for this application?
Is there another type of sensor that will not be affected by the spin of the wire coil?

Any help will be apreciated
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=617347d9-adea-43b5-8947-dcd7d4c355aa&file=20150722_094616.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Your originally noted variation in readings seem large compared to your full scale values, i.e., ~20%

The resistance and capacitance values mentioned above result in a 1 second time constant, so you need to be careful about whether the time constant is compatible with the timing of how the transition from one layer to the next is detected.

TTFN
faq731-376
7ofakss

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com:
 
Just finished the test with the L-P Filter. The signal from the sensor is much more stable now but I want to stabilize it a little more
Now the signal oscillation is +/- 0,3 V

Should I used a bigger cap? 150 uF? 200 uF?
Resistor used is 10k

Process speed performance has improved a lot!



 
Yes, increase. The 1 second time constant was just an informed guess. Nothing beats reality - so increase until it looks good.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
Tried with a 220uF cap and now the signal is very unstable again. I think even worst than without the filter! Not sure what is going on. I think I am going back to the 100 uF cap
 
Sounds like you are getting too near the phase margin. Sometimes, you have to accept what you get.

How did the problem start? Did it ever work well?

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
It was an used machine when we got it. A little after we bought it, I have to update the controls: old analog DC drives and analog control boards. I have installed new drives and a PLC. I also have to installed a dancer PID control board

Did it ever work well?
I am not sure. It took me a lot of time to get the machine to work. Specially to calibrate the PID control. Now I think that 50% of the problem was the signal from the distance sensor. I did not notice back then
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor