Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DN or NB

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pabster

Mechanical
Dec 1, 2008
7
Good day all,

I'm having some contention over the use of DN or NB, now my understanding is that for metric units you state: DN 600 mm
or imperial units: 24" NB

Now due to possible ignorance NB has been used for both situations i.e. 600 mm NB or 24" NB

I cannot find anywhere that states explicitly what is correct i.e. code statement or dictionary. I feel that I may lose this battle due to the volume of rework but I'd at least like to know that I'm not being an expletive.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

"When in doubt spell it out."

I have no idea what either DN or NB might possibly mean in the limited context of your post.
 
My bad,

Diamètre Nominal or Nominal Bore for Pipe/Nozzle sizes
 
The NPS (Nominal pipe size) is the standard used in North America to define a pipe size (inches). Nominal Bore (NB) is used interchangeably with NPS. The European standard equivalent to NPS is DN (diamètre nominal) and sizes are measured in millimetres.
 
Yep this is all understood, so how do you tell someone that you can't use NB with a metric unit? ASME code reference for example.
I agree this is common knowledge and it 'just is right' but how do you argue the point more effectively?
 
It depends under which code you are designing. European standards make use of DN designation (take a look at ISO 6708). American standards use NPS designation.
 
Agreed, this is where the complication lies. Some projects are ASME codes but with metric pipe/nozzle sizes.
 
IMO it is a false problem. Nominal Bore or better NPS is always expressed inches (imperial unit) and DN is always expressed in mm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor