Gopher13
Structural
- Jun 21, 2016
- 94
I understand one big advantage of composite beams (steel beam with concrete over metal deck) is reduced floor to floor height resulting in savings of finishes and MEP.
I have a case where they will be building a mechanical mezzanine inside an existing building. I am framing this mezzanine with steel wide flange beams, metal deck, and concrete topping. I don't really have any constraints that limit the depth I can use for structure. Anyone have a feel for how much weight in steel beam needs to be saved to offset the cost of field welding studs to the beams? I designed one of the main girders by hand and found a savings of about 10 pounds per foot when working compositely with the concrete. However, that same beam would require 3/4 inch diameter studs every 6 inches or so.
I have a case where they will be building a mechanical mezzanine inside an existing building. I am framing this mezzanine with steel wide flange beams, metal deck, and concrete topping. I don't really have any constraints that limit the depth I can use for structure. Anyone have a feel for how much weight in steel beam needs to be saved to offset the cost of field welding studs to the beams? I designed one of the main girders by hand and found a savings of about 10 pounds per foot when working compositely with the concrete. However, that same beam would require 3/4 inch diameter studs every 6 inches or so.