Shmulik
Mechanical
- Nov 19, 2001
- 295
UG-32(d) defines Acceptable Approximation for 2:1 ellips. head as one with knuckle radius of 0.17D and a spherical radius of 0.9D.
Kindly, my question is: may a head still be considered 2:1 ellipsoidal where knuckle rad. > 0.17D and/or spherical rad. < 0.9D ?
Can we have any answer for it from the following Interpretation?
_________________________________________________________
Interpretation: VIII-1-01-155
Subject: Section VIII, Division 1 (2001 Edition, 2002 Addenda); UG-32(d) and Appendix 1, 1-4
Date Issued: June 13, 2003
File: BC03-6l9
Question (1): When designing an ellipsoidal head with a head depth to diameter ratio different than one-fourth, must the provisions of 1-4(c) be satisfied?
Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): When designing a torispherical head with dimensions different than described by either UG-32(d) or UG-32(e), must the provisions of 1-4(d) be satisfied?
Reply (2): Yes.
_________________________________________________________
Kindly, my question is: may a head still be considered 2:1 ellipsoidal where knuckle rad. > 0.17D and/or spherical rad. < 0.9D ?
Can we have any answer for it from the following Interpretation?
_________________________________________________________
Interpretation: VIII-1-01-155
Subject: Section VIII, Division 1 (2001 Edition, 2002 Addenda); UG-32(d) and Appendix 1, 1-4
Date Issued: June 13, 2003
File: BC03-6l9
Question (1): When designing an ellipsoidal head with a head depth to diameter ratio different than one-fourth, must the provisions of 1-4(c) be satisfied?
Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): When designing a torispherical head with dimensions different than described by either UG-32(d) or UG-32(e), must the provisions of 1-4(d) be satisfied?
Reply (2): Yes.
_________________________________________________________