Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

Status
Not open for further replies.

palves

Structural
Jun 6, 2008
61
Can anybody out there give me their opinion on the relative merits of using the "Beam on Elastic Foundation" vs the basic "General Footing" or "Wall Footing" modules? I understand the underlying differences between the 2 modules, but am struggling to see a real-world application where the "Elastic Foundation" would be a more viable option. The basic footing checks seem much more comprehensive since, unlike the elastic analysis, they analyze for rebar as well as sliding and overturning. Do people use the two modules in conjunction with one another? Maybe use the elastic analysis to check the bearing pressures, and then the footing module to check the footing concrete itself? I'm still trying to figure this one out so let me know.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I have used the "Elastic Foundation" to analyze the foundation of a large generator. To check the foundation for flexure, I analyzed a 1' strip of the foundations as a "beam" with the applicable point and distributed loads (from fuel and water and what not). This gave me the necessary rebar for a 1' strip

To me, this seems more applicable (for flexure) than oversimplifying the problem into a general foundation and one point load.

In this instance, the maximum shear & moment was not at the center of the foundation.

I am new to this though, so feel free to correct any flaws you see in my judgement.
 
I believe the beam on elastic foundation would be more for grade beam applications where you have a row of columns supported by a continuous grade beam as opposed to isolated pad footings.

EIT
 
You make me recall my structures professor saying "use your engineering ring judgment.

I use Enercalc often and have done so for years. I recommend that your read Enercalc”s module description and limitations. I design using the footing when I have columns to be supported. You need to read ACI 318 since footing design will requires checks such as bending moment, shear and soil bearing pressure.

I use BOEF for grade beams, mats and other applications I deem appropriate. I model mats as one foot strip as was stated above.


Regards,
Lutfi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor