Absorption chillers usually can not produce cchilled water colder than 44°F. Thus you may not be able to get 49°F off the coil and you would require more air. Also absorption chillers generally can not respond quick enough to varying loads. New absorption chiller from Trane may be an exception. For reliability it is recommended to have a hybrid plant using mix of electric centrifugal & absorption.
You may not be able to reduce OA because labs may not want recirculation of air from other labs.
But anyway I used Trane System Analyser to come up with the following. i made assumptions since you have not given information.
For 22,050 sq ft square (2) story hospital in Newark NJ with 100% OA 24 hour operation, dual duct VFD centrifugal airfoil fans at 10" wg (max allowable input) 49°F cold deck, 125°F hot deck, two single stage steam absorption chillers: OA & SA CFM = 21554, Max building cooling load = 139 tons; max building heating load = 1961 mbh; building cooling coil load = 217,783 ton-hrs/yr; building heating coil load = 2,755,169 kBtu/yr; building energy usage = 649,261 Btu/(SF-yr); annual building electric consumption = 1,026,670 kwh; annual gas consumption = 108,122 therms.
For case using 20% OA & same as above:
Max building cooling load = 80 tons; max building heating load = 848 mbh; building cooling coil load = 175,623 ton-hrs/yr; building heating coil load = 2,428,294 kBtu/yr; building energy usage = 547,884 Btu/(SF-yr); annual building electric consumption = 928,843 kwh; annual gas consumption = 89,107 therms.