gbent
Agricultural
- Jan 6, 2002
- 78
I have seen many engine efficiency graphs for engines at full rated power, but I don't think I have ever seen a set of graphs showing engine efficiency vs. RPM for different constant engine loads. I would like to see information for both SI and CI engines.
This would help show the best RPM for different loads, and could help decide on final drive ratios for vehicles. For constant RPM usages, such as a stand-by power unit or a pump engine, would show the most efficient load range.
There is a company claiming tremendous improvements on Class 8 (80,000 lbs. GVW) diesel mileage by using a hydrostatic drive with variable displacement pumps and motors. The engine is reported to run at 1200 to 1400 RPM.
If something less than full rated power is needed, is the lower RPM that much more efficient? Given the usual inefficiency of fluid drive systems, engine efficiency maps would help evaluate the accuracy of their claims.
On older carburated engines, maximum efficiency was often claimed to be just before the power valve opened. Is there a similiar situation on a EFI engine?
Thanks
This would help show the best RPM for different loads, and could help decide on final drive ratios for vehicles. For constant RPM usages, such as a stand-by power unit or a pump engine, would show the most efficient load range.
There is a company claiming tremendous improvements on Class 8 (80,000 lbs. GVW) diesel mileage by using a hydrostatic drive with variable displacement pumps and motors. The engine is reported to run at 1200 to 1400 RPM.
If something less than full rated power is needed, is the lower RPM that much more efficient? Given the usual inefficiency of fluid drive systems, engine efficiency maps would help evaluate the accuracy of their claims.
On older carburated engines, maximum efficiency was often claimed to be just before the power valve opened. Is there a similiar situation on a EFI engine?
Thanks