Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ER308L vs ER308LSi 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

wcw1985

Mechanical
Oct 23, 2012
44
Dear All,

May i know when i qualify a WPS using consumable ER308L, is it in the future my WPS can use ER308LSI consumable as well?

Does the Si will require make me to requalify a new WPS?

Thanks in advance for reply.

Regards,
wcw
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If you are working to ASME IX, take a look at Table QW442 for A numbers, both classifications fall under A No. 8, so you should be fine with one procedure. Depending on construction code, other rules might come in to play.
 
ER308LSi would be recommended for GMAW welding. As jwht stated, per ASME A No. is the essential varialbe. However, if impact testing is required, ASW Classification is a supplementary essential variable.
 
Hi Weldstan,

Do you mean that if impact tested is performed during WPS using ER308LSi, a job that required to use ER308L with impact tested can not use the WPS with impact tested using ER308LSi?
 
In answer to your last question, separate qualifications would be required for 308L vs 308LSi. The addition of silicon results in a new class of filler metal. I should have considered the Supplemental requirements with my initial answer, since I run into the impact situation regularly and have to justify re-qualifying to people who claim that, and other requirements can't possibly apply to us.
 
Hi jwhit,

Thanks to you i am crystal clear now. :D

Cheers.

cw
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor