Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Explaination for C and C Zones attached?

Status
Not open for further replies.

engreg

Structural
Sep 8, 2022
29
The roof attached is the one that fits the one I am designing for. The height is roughly 30'. I am not used to designing with this 0.6h number for what I would normally call "a" which is the minimum of 0.1 L and 0.4 H. This 0.6H from both sides will make the entire building a corner zone. Is this how you guys read it. Similarly, zone 3 becomes massive. Has anyone come to any conclusions about this isometric. The ultimate question I am trying to answer is what values to use for "a", "b", and "c". "a" is simple as mentioned before "b" and "c" become massive when using this drawing.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

And which document is this from? Doesn't look familiar.
 
I think for the A dimension for the corner zone width on the walls may be an error (errata available online that addresses the similar Figure 30.4-1 on page 351).

Plus, for the walls, I think Figure 30.1-1 covers the same condition, and is correct.

Unless perhaps someone else knows more
 
So, do you read it as for all flat roofs we have to use that 0.6 number and the "a" value can only be used on pitched roofs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor