Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Explicit meshing - what to do with sharp corners 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

assafwei

Materials
Jul 20, 2008
89
Hi,

I am modelling crash and drop test for parts with a lot of very small radius features (<1mm). In order to get the run time to reasonable numbers I have to remove these radius features and most of the time I get sharp corners. When using implicit schemes I now this is a big no no, but in explicit I don't really have a choice (a few days run times are out of the question).

How do you tackle this issue? From my understanding sharp corners are less problematic in explicit analysis due to the dynamic nature of these problems, am I wrong?

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

That’s right, in explicit you can (or even should) remove the small features such as rounds/fillets. It won’t affect the accuracy significantly but will increase the stable time increment and thus speed up the analysis.
 
You should only model those radii that really matter (you want to know exact stress in that region).
If even this makes the runtime unreasonable, you could use mass scaling for those small elements.
 
Yes, smart mass scaling with a target time increment can help a lot in such cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor