Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Explosion Proof RTD's

Status
Not open for further replies.

danw2

Industrial
Oct 21, 2004
1,505
I must have missed a previous thread, RTD's Intrinsically Safe,
Link
Just found it in a search.

(Keith) >Never seen an ExP RTD before. Seems likely to lag the poor thing horridly. I could see them wanting to change out ExP for two reasons. One would be having to run the requisite thick-wall conduit and bulkhead plugging hassles and the other would be maybe needing a more responsive sensor.
-----------------

There's no lagging on the sensing element. Because the RTD is a 'simple apparatus', it's the screw cover head that is Class 1, Div 1 rated, not the sensing element.

Pyro_Hazardous_Area_Heat_Trace_RTDs_emdl2c.jpg
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Are you looking at a RTD or heat trace? In the past, I would spec a RTD in a thermowell. Then we would use C1, D2 wiring methods. If the "probe" had direct contact w/ a process, then I would go w/ IS.

Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor