Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Fabricated lap joint stub-end - fillet weld size 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

marty007

Mechanical
Mar 8, 2012
622
I've been having some disagreements with colleagues regarding fillet weld sizing on the back-side of fabricated lap joint stub-ends for use with standard ASME B16.5 lap joint flanges on ASME VIII-1 equipment. Any other perspectives would be much appreciated.

Perspective #1:
ASME B16.9 Table 6.1-9 provides dimensions for off-the-shelf one-piece stub ends. This table provides a dimension for the radius on the back-side of the stub end (dimension R). These stub-ends are intended for use with standard B16.5 lap joint flanges. Since we are using standard B16.5 flanges, we should be producing fabricated stub-ends to a geometry matching those of B16.9 stub ends. To that end, the fillet weld on the backside of the lap ring should be radiused and match the sizing of B16.9 Table 6.1-9.

Perspective #2:
As this is a fabricated stub-end rather than a one-piece machined stub end, we do not have to follow the dimensions of B16.9. Because this equipment is for an ASME VIII-1 application, we should weld on the lap ring according with ASME VIII-1 Figure 2-4 (1a).

Application - This is for titanium construction, and off-the shelf stub-ends are not readily available in the sizes we need. The pipes are very thin-wall (4" w/ 0.120" wall). If we were to go with B16.9 stub end sizing, this would require a 0.44" radiused weld, which is very thick compared to the pipe wall. If we go with ASME VIII-1 Figure 2-4 (1a), we could get away with a 0.12" simple fillet weld.

What do you all think?

Thanks for any help you can provide!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

marty007, my opinion, you need only comply with the Apx 2 sketch. Supporting, but not exactly ironclad, see also UW-2(a)(1)(c)(3).

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
We fabricate very few lethal service vessels, and I don't think I've ever designed one with lap joints... interesting reference!

Thanks,
Marty
 
Lap joint & lethal service...wouldn't be my first choice :)

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor