jimmytwotimes
Structural
- Feb 25, 2013
- 19
Corrosion potential due to the use of dissimilar metals is a common concern in the cladding industry. There are lots of factors: interior vs. exterior exposure, anodized vs. painted aluminum, prime painted vs. galvanized steel vs. stainless steel, steel fasteners vs. stainless fasteners, etc...I feel this is a topic that engineers often do not have a solid stance on - myself included.
I want to consider a simple case: two aluminum components need to be connected with a bolted connection (ie. clear holes in aluminum, fastener to consist of nut and bolt). Industry standard seems to call for the fastener to be stainless steel. This makes sense knowing the aluminum will corrode preferential to the fastener, but the rate of corrosion will be reduced since the anodic area is >> cathodic area. A bit of local corrosion around the fastener is probably acceptable.
What if the fastener was zinc plated steel? My thought would be the zinc corrodes at an increased rate, which leaves the steel exposed. Although the raw steel would likely be cathodic wrt to the aluminum, the raw steel would be susceptible to atmospheric corrosion, and that is not good practice.
In reality I feel there are a lot more factors that come into play, so I was looking if anyone could share their experience or thoughts. Zinc plated steel fasteners are more economical, but I'm hesitant to go against what I've seen to be industry standard, and my logic says is that way for good reason.
I want to consider a simple case: two aluminum components need to be connected with a bolted connection (ie. clear holes in aluminum, fastener to consist of nut and bolt). Industry standard seems to call for the fastener to be stainless steel. This makes sense knowing the aluminum will corrode preferential to the fastener, but the rate of corrosion will be reduced since the anodic area is >> cathodic area. A bit of local corrosion around the fastener is probably acceptable.
What if the fastener was zinc plated steel? My thought would be the zinc corrodes at an increased rate, which leaves the steel exposed. Although the raw steel would likely be cathodic wrt to the aluminum, the raw steel would be susceptible to atmospheric corrosion, and that is not good practice.
In reality I feel there are a lot more factors that come into play, so I was looking if anyone could share their experience or thoughts. Zinc plated steel fasteners are more economical, but I'm hesitant to go against what I've seen to be industry standard, and my logic says is that way for good reason.