brainsalad
Electrical
- Apr 16, 2012
- 33
Hello,
I am inserting fault impedance into 3-phase and line-to-line faults in order to find a limiting condition for overcurrent and undervoltage relay coordination.
This is for industrial 4.16kV and 480V systems, which have a fairly high X/R ratio.
Since the system is mostly reactive (high X/R ratio), inserting a purely reactive fault impedance produces the lowest post-fault bus voltage and lowest short circuit current, which is the limiting case for overcurrent vs. undervoltage coordination. For the same magnitude of fault impedance, the purely resistive fault impedance case results in a higher post-fault bus voltage and short circuit current, due to the large X/R ratio of the system.
What is the reality of fault impedance? When someone is talking about a sustained high impedance fault, as far as modeling goes, is the fault impedance itself resistive or reactive? Does anyone have any reference or basis for the nature of fault impedance, being resistive or inductive?
Thanks for your help.
I am inserting fault impedance into 3-phase and line-to-line faults in order to find a limiting condition for overcurrent and undervoltage relay coordination.
This is for industrial 4.16kV and 480V systems, which have a fairly high X/R ratio.
Since the system is mostly reactive (high X/R ratio), inserting a purely reactive fault impedance produces the lowest post-fault bus voltage and lowest short circuit current, which is the limiting case for overcurrent vs. undervoltage coordination. For the same magnitude of fault impedance, the purely resistive fault impedance case results in a higher post-fault bus voltage and short circuit current, due to the large X/R ratio of the system.
What is the reality of fault impedance? When someone is talking about a sustained high impedance fault, as far as modeling goes, is the fault impedance itself resistive or reactive? Does anyone have any reference or basis for the nature of fault impedance, being resistive or inductive?
Thanks for your help.