Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

fcu vs fc'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Enhineyero

Structural
Sep 1, 2011
284
I dont know if anyone has tried this but I was wondering if you use the design mix to form a cylinder (according to ACI) and use the same design mix to form a cube (according to BS / Eurocode)will it come up with the same strength? or atleast an insignificant difference?

I read from some other forum that it will not yield similar results and that the cube will be stronger. I dont know if that is real or the guy was just playing with us. because by theory they should be the same right?

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

No. If I remember correctly, the European test cube is a bit smaller, and thus, the confining effect will, in fact, yield higher results.

I wouldn't worry about it though, as I am sure the Eurocode is calibrated to these test results.
 
In the Eurocode, concrete's compressive strength is specified as CXX/XX (e.g. C30/37), in MPa.

The first number is for compressive testing done in a 150 mm diameter and 300 mm high cilinder, the secondo one is for a 150 mm cube.
 
For concrete with strength up to 50 MPa the cylindrical strength (fck) is about 17% lower than cubic strength (fck,cube). Example, concrete grade C30/37: fck = 30 MPa, fck,cube = 37 MPa, fck = 0.83 fck,cube (approximately).

ing. FERRARI Alberto -
 
Agree with the above statements. A commonly used relationship that compares cylinder and cube strength is f'c = 0.8 fcu.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor