CivilizedPE
Civil/Environmental
- Feb 6, 2013
- 19
I'm working on project in a rural area of NY that has a municipal water supply. I need to determine the needed fire flow to the site and think I can use NPFA 1 to do this. Some suggested using NFPA 1142, but that is for rural or suburban areas where an adequate water supply doesn't exist. Since we are connecting to a municipal system that happens to have an elevated tank, I didn't think it applied. However, we have calculations based on both codes and are comparing the two. Our AHJ simply says to meet NFPA, but doesn't specify a section. FYI, our buildings are sprinklered so we are applying the 75% credit allowed by NFPA 1, Chapter 18. Even with the 75% credit the fire flow is greater than the sprinkler demands, so that governs the supply volume.
Does anyone know why NFPA 1 Table 18.4.5.1.2 omits occupancy and only considers construction type, while the minimum water supply calculation in NFPA 1142 4.3.1 uses both occupancy and construction type? Any suggestions for minimizing the required volume of storage? We are already accounting for fire separations in the buildings and counting them as separate buildings. Thanks for the input.
Does anyone know why NFPA 1 Table 18.4.5.1.2 omits occupancy and only considers construction type, while the minimum water supply calculation in NFPA 1142 4.3.1 uses both occupancy and construction type? Any suggestions for minimizing the required volume of storage? We are already accounting for fire separations in the buildings and counting them as separate buildings. Thanks for the input.