Isbtanwir
Mechanical
- Aug 9, 2012
- 5
Dear All,
I would like to post a question regarding what is the industry spacialist experience in requiring fire protection system for NGL processing plant. I am involved in fire protection code study for one NGL plant and client specifically wants "no fire water or fixed fire protection system in there plant mainly because it is impracticle for them to install on there facility due to (1)cost of installation (2)water is not available cheap (3) freezing conditions (4) most importantly they know that other NGL processing competitors dont have fire water system in there plant."
I have done code study for API 2510, 2510A, 2218, NFPA 58. And since plant is located in British Columbia, I am still doing code study for Building Code and Fire Code for British Columbia. NFPA 58 says it is not applicable to natural gas processing facilities so thats' OUT. API 2510 give option of (1) having fire water system or (2) no fixed fire water but portable fire water and fire proofing of equipments Or (3) NOTHING. Yes API 2510, says you can have nothing at NGL facilty as long as facility is "remote located" and client agrees with the cost of fire damage.
My client, want to gather some data from different industry fire spacialist as to what other people do and how do they justify that they need no fire protection or limited fire protection in their plant. I am still lost in British columbia code review and to find if that building or fire code has any specific requirements. I would appreciate your guidance this regards for finding specific details in British columbia codes. OR what are industry practices in this regards and how do they justify it.
Thanks All.
I would like to post a question regarding what is the industry spacialist experience in requiring fire protection system for NGL processing plant. I am involved in fire protection code study for one NGL plant and client specifically wants "no fire water or fixed fire protection system in there plant mainly because it is impracticle for them to install on there facility due to (1)cost of installation (2)water is not available cheap (3) freezing conditions (4) most importantly they know that other NGL processing competitors dont have fire water system in there plant."
I have done code study for API 2510, 2510A, 2218, NFPA 58. And since plant is located in British Columbia, I am still doing code study for Building Code and Fire Code for British Columbia. NFPA 58 says it is not applicable to natural gas processing facilities so thats' OUT. API 2510 give option of (1) having fire water system or (2) no fixed fire water but portable fire water and fire proofing of equipments Or (3) NOTHING. Yes API 2510, says you can have nothing at NGL facilty as long as facility is "remote located" and client agrees with the cost of fire damage.
My client, want to gather some data from different industry fire spacialist as to what other people do and how do they justify that they need no fire protection or limited fire protection in their plant. I am still lost in British columbia code review and to find if that building or fire code has any specific requirements. I would appreciate your guidance this regards for finding specific details in British columbia codes. OR what are industry practices in this regards and how do they justify it.
Thanks All.