Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

FMEA Risk Priority Number (RPN) - what is the minimum threshold to rank the RPN as "High Risk&q 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Orga78

Mechanical
Aug 15, 2017
38
Hi All,

I am currently working on pilot FMEA program for one of the critical assets in our plant. There has been a debate on the RPN minimum number, where the failure mode is defined as "high risk" and "need immediate attention" at the number of 120. Any RPN above or equal to 120 is HIGH RISK. Below 120, considered as LOW. Let's take below matrix as an example:

Case A:
Severity = 10
Occurrence = 4
Detectability = 3
RPN = 120

Case B:
Severity = 5
Occurrence = 4
Detectability = 6
RPN = 120

Based on the above examples, both with same RON of 120, Case A warrants us to define it as "Need Immediate Attention - because of its inherent severity", while Case B is "risk may be acceptable, but let's work on enhancing its detectability".

I attended a Quality Course recently and 120 was being mentioned by the instructor as "Best Practice". Not sure if there is ever a minimum threshold number for RPN to define it as "need immediate attention" in the industry standard (MIL-STD-1629 et al). But I would really appreciate of any of you in this Forum have your "standard" or best practices on FMEA RPN definition or classification.

Thank you.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I've seen 100-150 determined as being the threshold at various places; but it's all hand waving. I've had FMEAs throw an 80 that I wasn't happy with and wasn't a challenge to reduce, so it got reduced.

RPN is a tool to rank things against each-other, not to determine what you need to work on and what you can ignore.
 
Many thanks both Greg & Ted for your inputs.

I share similar views as well that there shouldn't be a magic number to restrict what failure modes should be prioritized based on its RPN, but to focus on the inherent or un-mitigated risks (S x O) as the FMEA workshop concludes the RPNs.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor