Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

For IBC 2006 TABLE 1604.3 DEFLECTIO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yazan Atoum

Structural
Nov 4, 2016
18
For IBC 2006 TABLE 1604.3 DEFLECTION LIMITS, It states the limits for (S or W), in this case do I have to consider the effect of the wind load solely on the structure or I can calculate the deflection based on the criteria: D + 0.5L + 0.7W in Design Guide 3 ?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Consider the worst case condition
 
I know I can do that, but I want a codified answer, I don't want an overdesgined approach.
 
That's not an overdesign approach. It is required by code.
 
Can you please guide me to the refernce, I always design for the limit D+0.5L+0.7W but It's written in IBC table 1604.3 S or W or 0.7 W of components and cladding
 
IBC allows you to check deflection for 70% of the ASD design wind load.

DaveAtkins
 
For wind loads that are components and cladding, not MFWRS. Are you asking about components or wind drift requirements?
 
I am asking for wind drift, when I check for the limits in IBC Table 1604, do I calculate the drift based on D+0.5L+0.7W or W solely.
That's all, thanks
 
Wind drift is not Code-mandated, and this chart doesn't apply for wind/seismic building drift. It is for deflection of individual members.

Read the Appendix C Commentary in the back of ASCE 7 for wind drift guidance---again, not Code-mandated, but something designers are at risk if they don't consider. ASCE does suggest your D+0.5L+W. There is plenty of discussion here about wind drift. H/400 is the most common value, although I have my doubts how often this is truly reached.
Wind drift is primarily influenced by the connection/jointing of the nonstructural elements such as precast, brick, glass, etc. If the joints can handle rotation without leaking water, a higher drift is justified. This is a very difficult parameter to pin down, however, so the cost savings should be substantial if less than H/400 is sought.

When I do wind drift, as a general rule I use 0.7 (0.42 of ultimate; 10-year MRI) W and design for H/400. I ignore D and any uplift wind since they are vertical forces and therefore don't have a significant influence on lateral drift.
 
Try the AISC Engineering Journal, First Quarter 1993.

They have a nifty table outlining all sorts of drifts based on exterior cladding and supporting frame.

This is not code required in the U.S. for wind.


Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
faq731-376
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor