Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Formula for Right Half Plane Zero in a Boost Converter 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

DHambley

Electrical
Dec 7, 2006
246
Lloyd Dixon gave us this equation long ago for the corner frequency of the RHP zero for a Boost converter:

F = (1/2pi)* R/L * (1-D)^2/D
= (1/2pi)* R/L * (Vi/Vo)^2/D

Other app notes from TI give this equation:

F = (1/2pi)* R/L * (1-D)^2
= (1/2pi)* R/L * (Vi/Vo)^2
There's no D (duty cyle) in this denominator!

National Semi gives this formula:

F = (1/2pi)* 1/L * (Vin*D)/Iin

Well, these three just don't match! Any thoughts on who's right? I've always used the first formula above.

DH
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Well, looks like this thread took some tangents to different subjects. I see I confused some people initially by stating "transfer function" when I was actually analyzing the closed loop equation with V-in fixed at a constant value. To bad, this seems to have induced rude remarks. The original problem wasn't the transfer function from Vin to Vout. (Of COURSE these two vary by '1/D'. That's obvious.) Sorry for the confusion. It was the closed loop response w.r.t. pulse width which was my issue. (When we're talking about Vin being a contant value, we aren't talking about the small-signal transfer function from input to output.) For this circuit, V-in is a slowly changing value, the frequency of which is much lower than the RHPZ, so again, it's not input-to-output transfer function which was the original issue.
By the way, the circuit has been in production for 2 months now. It works fine from 5V low-line to the 60V transient. I had found and verified the correct equations shortly after the first post. The closed loop tests show the RHPZ where the calculations say it should be.
 
No problem. I'm glad we agree and that your closed loop tests affirm the correct RHPZ frequency value of (R*(1-D)^2)/L, for the boost topology. We did go off on a tangent but covered some interesting stuff.

This stuff is good to go over and review. None of us really know as much as we think we do. Twice a week in grad school class I am reminded of my limitations. Peer review and re-examining our own positions can only help us. If I'm wrong, I benefit by being corrected. Even when I'm right, reviewing my steps and thought process is a good sanity check. BR.

Claude
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor