Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Found this Design Standard for blind rivet usage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sparweb

Aerospace
May 21, 2003
5,104
0
36
CA
This usage is applicable to Mil-STD-7885 blind rivets.
Requirement #3 is surprising, unless I accept that the locking ring is always effective, which I don't, having pulled a few Cherrys myself.
So often, the reason for using the blind rivet is that the tail is in an inaccessible area, hence uninspectable.
The tribal knowledge that has reached me forbids using these in critical locations. The comparison with #7 does not make this clearer.

MS33522C_Rivets_Blind_Structural_Design_Requirements_pfrmit.png


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

SW... FYI only...

MIL-R-7885/1 thru /238[?] [Cherry Max style] blind rivets have, for the most-part, been replaced/superseded by NAS9301 thru NAS9314.

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top