Testing the frequency elements on a SEL relay is a bit different that others. Ex if one wanted a definite time of 5 cyc on a 50 element and performed the test, the trip time would very closely match the delay setting. Not so much on SEL frequency elements. I happen to be in front of a SEL-311C with a Doble connected.
Our frequency settings are for event reports and SER only, but it was easy enough to test and report the results.
81D1P(ickup) = 59.3 Hz
81D1d(elay) =
2.0 (cycles)
Test Data (State Simulator)
Prefault Nom V, Nom F for 60cyc. Fault = Nom V, F=59.299 Hz. Start timer at fault state. Trip time =
109.1 mSec. (Doble reports
6.546 cyc (60 cy base))
I wonder if this was considered with the initial settings.
From the SEL application guide AG2018-32 "Setting and Testing Frequency Elements With Time Delay in Cycles"
SEL 81 App Guide
"TIME-DELAY CONSIDERATIONS
The power system frequency will not be at nominal value (50 Hz or 60 Hz) when an over- or
underfrequency condition occurs. The relay adjusts processing algorithms to track the system
frequency, and this can make the delay seem shorter or longer than expected. The observed delay
depends on the frequency of the power system during an excursion and whether the frequency
change is applied as a step change, a ramp, or some other function.
Generally, the frequency elements operate on the frequency determined from voltage connected to
the VA-N terminal of the relay. The relay uses a zero-crossing period measurement technique on
the voltage applied to the terminals to determine the power system frequency.
There is an intrinsic delay in the instantaneous frequency elements that depends on the pickup
setting (81DxP), the applied voltage signal, and the conditions prior to a change in signal. System
disturbances that do not cause the undervoltage block element (27B81) to assert can affect voltage
signals and cause the instantaneous frequency elements (81Dx) to assert briefly. It is therefore best
to use a minimum time-delay setting (81DxD) of 5 cycles."