n1cq
Civil/Environmental
- Feb 19, 2003
- 10
I have found a contractor with an interesting theory about frost heaving.
The scenario concerns a "monolithic" 2000 gallon concrete "tight tank" which is actually a precast "box" with an 8" thick h-20 rated lid which fits into the typical set of grooves one finds on standard "split" tanks. The only difference is that the groove is near the top of the tank.
This fellow claims that this past winter frost action had lifted the tank cap allowing water to leak into the tank.
He claims a 2"+/- lip (casting defect) overhanging the remainder of the tank body was enough of an area for the lens to form and push upward.
Next week I am going view the unearthing of the top portion of the tank and take a few photos for documentation purposes and my report of findings.
My major reservations of the contractors theory are:
1. Thermal heat produced by enclosed wastwaters would always maintain the outwall wall of the tank slightly above 32f.
2. The soils below the suspected ice lens having enough bearing capacity to react against the expanding ice.
3. The fact that this theory is an easy way for the contractor to skip out of a bad waterproofing job.
What do you think?
n1cq
The scenario concerns a "monolithic" 2000 gallon concrete "tight tank" which is actually a precast "box" with an 8" thick h-20 rated lid which fits into the typical set of grooves one finds on standard "split" tanks. The only difference is that the groove is near the top of the tank.
This fellow claims that this past winter frost action had lifted the tank cap allowing water to leak into the tank.
He claims a 2"+/- lip (casting defect) overhanging the remainder of the tank body was enough of an area for the lens to form and push upward.
Next week I am going view the unearthing of the top portion of the tank and take a few photos for documentation purposes and my report of findings.
My major reservations of the contractors theory are:
1. Thermal heat produced by enclosed wastwaters would always maintain the outwall wall of the tank slightly above 32f.
2. The soils below the suspected ice lens having enough bearing capacity to react against the expanding ice.
3. The fact that this theory is an easy way for the contractor to skip out of a bad waterproofing job.
What do you think?
n1cq