Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
Fundamental natural Frequency; Sign Poles
- Thread starter signeng
- Start date
This site (Florida DOT) has a list of downloadable programs (mathcad sheets, etc) for the design of many highway structures.
If you don't have mathcad you might be able to load these in MathCad Explorer, downloadable from the
The natural frequency is a function of the mass of the sign and structure, the Young's Modulus and Moment of Interia.
If you don't have mathcad you might be able to load these in MathCad Explorer, downloadable from the
The natural frequency is a function of the mass of the sign and structure, the Young's Modulus and Moment of Interia.
The fundamental frequency of an structural assembly properly modeled should be ascertainable from 3D programs with dynamics capability. Maybe even modest cost RISA 3D can do it even with hinge inserts. Respect damping ratio, Chopra gives
Under 0.5 Fy stress...
0.02 to 0.03 for nude steel welded structures
0.05 to 0.07 for nude steel bolted structures
Just prior to yiel Under 0.5 Fy stress...
0.05 to 0.07 for nude steel welded structures
0.10 to 0.15 for nude steel bolted structures
It is simpler to design in accord to a code, that in Spain exist, albeit it won't be suited for some high seismic places.
Respect attached weights (panels) the model should be as complete as to not need further separate (and worse) account.
Also is of relevance how account is made of Vortex Shedding, and of local over-pressures. Basically, either you design by a code, or you descend to the "truth" in the science of construction, what no doubt for cases will discover weaknesses of the approved codes for a thing like the one you attempt detailed analysis of.
Under 0.5 Fy stress...
0.02 to 0.03 for nude steel welded structures
0.05 to 0.07 for nude steel bolted structures
Just prior to yiel Under 0.5 Fy stress...
0.05 to 0.07 for nude steel welded structures
0.10 to 0.15 for nude steel bolted structures
It is simpler to design in accord to a code, that in Spain exist, albeit it won't be suited for some high seismic places.
Respect attached weights (panels) the model should be as complete as to not need further separate (and worse) account.
Also is of relevance how account is made of Vortex Shedding, and of local over-pressures. Basically, either you design by a code, or you descend to the "truth" in the science of construction, what no doubt for cases will discover weaknesses of the approved codes for a thing like the one you attempt detailed analysis of.
I agree with abhio. Programs may be required for complex calculations, but for a sign, its just a cantilever. Make sure you're looking at the correct natural frequency. Omega_n is the angular natural frequency (rad/s) and the natural frequency f_n would be [Omega_n/(2pi)] (Hz).
- Status
