aaloui
Mechanical
- Jul 26, 2011
- 18
Hi,
I would like to know your opinion about the expression of the gasket load at operating condition termed HG in the appendix 2 of ASME BPVC VIII-1.
There, it is defined as Wm1-H=H+Hp-H=Hp, means the required gasket load at operating condition, only the required.
The problem is that W can be much higher than Wm1 and I have such a case. The initial bolt load is equal to W which balances the initial gasket load. As the pressure is applied, and assuming that bold load remain unchaged (stiffness gasket>>stiffness bolt), then the actual (operating) gasket load would be W-H > Wm1-H=Hp.
It means the actual operating gasket reaction load is higher than given by the formula of HG in the code, resuting in higher moment and nonconservative result when using HG expression of the code exactly as it is defined.
The problem lies in the definition of HG through Wm1, the minimum required bold load at operation. I would suggest HG=W-H.
I appreciate if you can share your opinion.
Regards
Ali
I would like to know your opinion about the expression of the gasket load at operating condition termed HG in the appendix 2 of ASME BPVC VIII-1.
There, it is defined as Wm1-H=H+Hp-H=Hp, means the required gasket load at operating condition, only the required.
The problem is that W can be much higher than Wm1 and I have such a case. The initial bolt load is equal to W which balances the initial gasket load. As the pressure is applied, and assuming that bold load remain unchaged (stiffness gasket>>stiffness bolt), then the actual (operating) gasket load would be W-H > Wm1-H=Hp.
It means the actual operating gasket reaction load is higher than given by the formula of HG in the code, resuting in higher moment and nonconservative result when using HG expression of the code exactly as it is defined.
The problem lies in the definition of HG through Wm1, the minimum required bold load at operation. I would suggest HG=W-H.
I appreciate if you can share your opinion.
Regards
Ali