Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Governing Temperature (UCS-66 ASME SecVIII Div 1)

Status
Not open for further replies.

nickypaliwal

Materials
Aug 28, 2014
199
Refer case as below for pressure vessel (design code is Sec VIII Div I - Section UCS-66):
- Required thickness of vessel - 9.5 mm
- Vendor offered A106 GrB SCH80 for shell so nominal thickness is 10.97mm
-Minimum Design Temperature - minus 29degC (-20degF)

As per the curve, A106 should fall in curve B and hence the max. thickness up to which impact testing is not required is 10mm(0.394inch).

Do we need impact tested material since the required thickness is less and the actual and nominal thickness would be more than the allowable non-impact tested material thickness of 10mm.
Which thickness should be the used for governing thciknes? Required Thickness, Nominal Thickness, Actual Thickness?




Nickypaliwal

Materials & Corrosion Engineer
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

No impacts required.....UG-20(f) exempts P1 material to -20F....some restrictions, check it out. You don't have much excess thickness above that required, when you take into account the 12.5% undertolerance of SA-106B pipe. 10.97 x .875 = 9.6mm.
 
Which is why the MDT was set at -29 deg C in the first place. Nothing to do with process and exposure conditions, everything to do with the minimum temperature where Charpy testing can be avoided.

Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant


All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.
 
The thickness for impact exemption curves in UG-66 is the governing thickness as defined UCS-66 and Figure UCS-66.3. The examples are obvious.


 
Thanks for your expert opinions.

Can you also confirm as which thickness do we generally look at while deciding for impact test?

Although I have gone through the UCS66 and Fig UCS66.3 earlier also but am not clear as which thickness are they referring to?

Is governing thickness based on the
-Required Thickness,
-Nominal Thickness or
-Actual Thickness?

Nickypaliwal

Materials & Corrosion Engineer
 
Nominal thickness would be tg (governing thickness).
 
You need to read paragraph UCS-66 as well as the table. Paragraph UCS-66 clearly defines what the governing thickness is.
 
Dear
you can find the exact definition of governing thickness on ucs-66 (a) 1&2. although by role of thumb it could be nominal thickness.
 
Starting with nominal, uncorroded thickness, follow Part UCS-66(a) rules to determine governing thickness, and in turn, MDMT.

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor