weisusu
Bioengineer
- Sep 19, 2008
- 26
Hello All:
I am working on the set-up of a machining process in order to meet 0.30000" inner diameter with +/- 0.000080" tolerance. The plan is to measure the inner diameter with CMM. The following tasks were performed.
(1) Performed a repeatability study using a ring gage on the CMM machine. The "certified" size of the ring gage is 0.30000". CMM measured 0.300040" on average, which is 0.000040" oversize.
(2) GRR was performed on the CMM machine to measure the inner diameter. The % GRR tolerance is <30%.
Questions:
(1) Knowing that the CMM measured 0.000040" oversize, do I need to use a smaller machining bore so that the expected inner diameter is 0.000040" below my target (nominal of 0.30000”)?
(2) In relation to # 1 above, since %GRR is <30%, which is acceptable, does it matter if the CMM measured 0.000040" based on the ring gage repeatability study.
I am working on the set-up of a machining process in order to meet 0.30000" inner diameter with +/- 0.000080" tolerance. The plan is to measure the inner diameter with CMM. The following tasks were performed.
(1) Performed a repeatability study using a ring gage on the CMM machine. The "certified" size of the ring gage is 0.30000". CMM measured 0.300040" on average, which is 0.000040" oversize.
(2) GRR was performed on the CMM machine to measure the inner diameter. The % GRR tolerance is <30%.
Questions:
(1) Knowing that the CMM measured 0.000040" oversize, do I need to use a smaller machining bore so that the expected inner diameter is 0.000040" below my target (nominal of 0.30000”)?
(2) In relation to # 1 above, since %GRR is <30%, which is acceptable, does it matter if the CMM measured 0.000040" based on the ring gage repeatability study.