Just had a 24x36 garage pad poured 4-5" thick (garage doors were not installed). Ambient temp was around 50°F and probably got to 25-30°F at night for the first 3 days. After that the high only reached 45°F. 3 control joints were used. After 3 days I am seeing random hairline cracks. Surface was worked real smooth. The cracking is not crazing from what I can tell. The cracks have not opened up in 11 days. Concrete guy says he will do a hammer test. What else should I require to ensure I do not have troubles years down the road. Jackhammer it up?
Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
-
Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Hairline Cracks after 3 days
- Thread starter Russellwh
- Start date
Russellwh:
Here are some comments from ACI CHAPTER 22 — STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE (concrete without reinforcement).
R22.2 — Limitations
R22.2.2 — Since the structural integrity of plain concrete members depends solely on the properties of the concrete, use of structural plain concrete members should be limited to: members that are primarily in a state of compression; members that can tolerate random cracks without detriment to their structural integrity; and members where ductility is not an essential feature of design. The tensile strength of concrete can be utilized in design of members when the buildup of tensile stresses due to restraint
from creep, shrinkage, or temperature effects are considered and sufficiently reduced by construction techniques to avoid uncontrolled cracks, or when uncontrolled cracks due to such restraint effects can be anticipated to occur in such a manner that will not induce structural failure or collapse.
R22.3 — Joints
Joints in plain concrete construction are an important design consideration. In reinforced concrete, reinforcement is provided to resist the stresses due to restraint of creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects. In plain concrete, joints are the only design means of controlling and thereby relieving the buildup of such tensile stresses. A plain concrete member, therefore, must be small enough, or divided into smaller elements by joints, to control the buildup of internal stresses. The joint may be a contraction joint or an isolation joint. A minimum 25 percent reduction of member thickness is considered sufficient for contraction joints to be effective. The jointing must be such that no axial tension or flexural tension can be developed across a joint after cracking, if applicable, a condition referred to by the code as flexural discontinuity. Where random cracking due to creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects will not affect the structural integrity, and is otherwise acceptable, such as transverse cracks in a continuous wall footing, transverse contraction or isolation joints are not necessary.
So he may be allowed to use plain concrete, as these cracks seem to be minor and are not detrimental to the slab's integrity. He did use joints, just not in a timely manner. But they were too late, and the cracking had already occurred. Hence the use of rebar. May be overkill, but it would have significantly reduced the cracking before the joints were cut.
These comments said, along with everyone else's you can decide your proper course of action.
I recommend you do the following.
Check with your local building official about reinforcement in slabs (particularly slabs on grade). As mentioned before, was he under contract for rebar? That should have been written down on the contract documents, not implied. Check what your actual weather records were 2-3 days before the pour date and the cure dates following (going on 7 days?). And I mean all facets: temp, wind, and humidity. This will show proper knowledge of near freezing temps and that he should have taken means to prevent freezing in the new slab. Is their evidence of a sprayed-on-membrane as the curing agent for the slab (would look sort of like dried milk)? Was he also under contract to do this also?
Other questions for you. What type of fill did you use? How was it compacted? Did you add water while compacting? Did the contractor add water to the fill just before he placed his concrete? These are going to be valid questions from his part or his representatives if it gets that far.
If you are looking for someone to blame, you really only have one person with whom you should be concerned. That would be your general contractor. He is ultimately responsible for all his subs and their work.
As for the comments of a crack free slab. My garage pad is 26x26 @ 5" deep with 6x6 WWF. Concrete was placed at about 50-deg F. and immediately covered and saw cut (1/2 each way). The slab was then wet-cured for 6 days. The joints were then properly sealed (backer-rod is essential in this process or the sealant may fail).
The pad is on its second winter, with lows in the -20s deg F. and highs about 100 deg F. The garage is uninusulated, so the covered slab has easily seen a temperature gradient of 70-deg F. (a common design factor). The pad is crack free. If it would have cracked, it would have done it as yours did - right away or after the first winter. It didn't and I'm sure it won't.
A crack free pad can be done, not as a gamble, but with proper design knowledge, proper construction methods, and a highly skilled and trustworthy general.
Good luck in resolving your problem. You are going to need it!
Dan
Here are some comments from ACI CHAPTER 22 — STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE (concrete without reinforcement).
R22.2 — Limitations
R22.2.2 — Since the structural integrity of plain concrete members depends solely on the properties of the concrete, use of structural plain concrete members should be limited to: members that are primarily in a state of compression; members that can tolerate random cracks without detriment to their structural integrity; and members where ductility is not an essential feature of design. The tensile strength of concrete can be utilized in design of members when the buildup of tensile stresses due to restraint
from creep, shrinkage, or temperature effects are considered and sufficiently reduced by construction techniques to avoid uncontrolled cracks, or when uncontrolled cracks due to such restraint effects can be anticipated to occur in such a manner that will not induce structural failure or collapse.
R22.3 — Joints
Joints in plain concrete construction are an important design consideration. In reinforced concrete, reinforcement is provided to resist the stresses due to restraint of creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects. In plain concrete, joints are the only design means of controlling and thereby relieving the buildup of such tensile stresses. A plain concrete member, therefore, must be small enough, or divided into smaller elements by joints, to control the buildup of internal stresses. The joint may be a contraction joint or an isolation joint. A minimum 25 percent reduction of member thickness is considered sufficient for contraction joints to be effective. The jointing must be such that no axial tension or flexural tension can be developed across a joint after cracking, if applicable, a condition referred to by the code as flexural discontinuity. Where random cracking due to creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects will not affect the structural integrity, and is otherwise acceptable, such as transverse cracks in a continuous wall footing, transverse contraction or isolation joints are not necessary.
So he may be allowed to use plain concrete, as these cracks seem to be minor and are not detrimental to the slab's integrity. He did use joints, just not in a timely manner. But they were too late, and the cracking had already occurred. Hence the use of rebar. May be overkill, but it would have significantly reduced the cracking before the joints were cut.
These comments said, along with everyone else's you can decide your proper course of action.
I recommend you do the following.
Check with your local building official about reinforcement in slabs (particularly slabs on grade). As mentioned before, was he under contract for rebar? That should have been written down on the contract documents, not implied. Check what your actual weather records were 2-3 days before the pour date and the cure dates following (going on 7 days?). And I mean all facets: temp, wind, and humidity. This will show proper knowledge of near freezing temps and that he should have taken means to prevent freezing in the new slab. Is their evidence of a sprayed-on-membrane as the curing agent for the slab (would look sort of like dried milk)? Was he also under contract to do this also?
Other questions for you. What type of fill did you use? How was it compacted? Did you add water while compacting? Did the contractor add water to the fill just before he placed his concrete? These are going to be valid questions from his part or his representatives if it gets that far.
If you are looking for someone to blame, you really only have one person with whom you should be concerned. That would be your general contractor. He is ultimately responsible for all his subs and their work.
As for the comments of a crack free slab. My garage pad is 26x26 @ 5" deep with 6x6 WWF. Concrete was placed at about 50-deg F. and immediately covered and saw cut (1/2 each way). The slab was then wet-cured for 6 days. The joints were then properly sealed (backer-rod is essential in this process or the sealant may fail).
The pad is on its second winter, with lows in the -20s deg F. and highs about 100 deg F. The garage is uninusulated, so the covered slab has easily seen a temperature gradient of 70-deg F. (a common design factor). The pad is crack free. If it would have cracked, it would have done it as yours did - right away or after the first winter. It didn't and I'm sure it won't.
A crack free pad can be done, not as a gamble, but with proper design knowledge, proper construction methods, and a highly skilled and trustworthy general.
Good luck in resolving your problem. You are going to need it!
Dan
Russellwh
Your cracks are unsightly only, it should be fine structurally. Ideally the contractor should have cured with a typical black industrial blanket on the concrete to keep in the heat [and moisture] for 3-4 days where after that the concrete would have reached ambient temperature and the hydration slowed. The other curing methods mentioned can be detrimental in cold weather concrete conditions. Sawcuts are usually cut the next day in many cases due to residential constraints [noise]and slower cement hydration in winter. A floor crack is an unplanned joint, a floor with saw cuts still has cracks but it is tidy. Schmidt hammers do not read concrete strengths much below 2000 psi and there is no spec for in situ concrete, concrete strength acceptance is lab cured test cylinders at 28-days.
Your cracks are unsightly only, it should be fine structurally. Ideally the contractor should have cured with a typical black industrial blanket on the concrete to keep in the heat [and moisture] for 3-4 days where after that the concrete would have reached ambient temperature and the hydration slowed. The other curing methods mentioned can be detrimental in cold weather concrete conditions. Sawcuts are usually cut the next day in many cases due to residential constraints [noise]and slower cement hydration in winter. A floor crack is an unplanned joint, a floor with saw cuts still has cracks but it is tidy. Schmidt hammers do not read concrete strengths much below 2000 psi and there is no spec for in situ concrete, concrete strength acceptance is lab cured test cylinders at 28-days.
If that means using a soft cut saw -yes - otherwise in cool/cold weather the concrete is usually not strong to make a clean cut with a typical saw until the next morning sometime. Prematurely cutting the floor results in joints with broken out aggregate along the edges so the cut time has to be felt out a bit. The concrete should/hopefully be able to produce enough heat to prevent thermal shrinkagage, not a problem if some protection is used. Varies with cementitous too.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question