Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Heat Treating and UTS Graphs

Status
Not open for further replies.

amtconi

Automotive
Nov 10, 2017
4
Hi everybody!

Looking for some help. I'm trying to compare and ultimately duplicate a 4130 tubing graph after UTS testing of two similar materials.

In graph 1, this is the material I currently have. The graph shows that it is very resilient up to the yield point and very linear (and typical of the UTS graphs I see from past testing).

tensilegraph1_qayylo.jpg


In graph 2, this the material I want to duplicate. On the graph it is much more pliable and progressive all the way to yield on to max tensile.

tensilegraph2_an66b4.jpg


Could this be a post welding heat treat that changes the material in graph 2 to act this way? Both materials are extremely similar in yield, UTS and elongation. They are also the same heat treat finish GBK (+A), and they also are extremely similar on the chemical analysis. I'm really at a loss to explain the large difference in the graph shape and what can be done to the material I have to make it behave in a similar fashion.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I would re-heat treat a few samples of each using slightly different tempering temperatures and see what you get.


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
What do you think it would take to produce such a unique graph as in graph #2? I do not typically see UTS graphs that look that shape.
 
Are you really sure that it wasn't the test?
Have you looked at micros?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
Metallographic analysis was done on both samples. Structure description and decarb numbers were almost identical. I've had the samples tested more than once.
 
That looks like a testing anomaly, such as slippage in the grips. What is the specimen geometry and grip style?
 
I had to have a lab make the tensile strength tests but considering all the tests on the #2 graph look like that graph I can't believe they made a mistake 3 more times.

I'm really at a loss to explain the graph shape. Seems like everyone I talk to can't explain how to get 4130 tubing to look copy the graph either.

I'd love to see a UTS graph for stainless steel tubing. I am wondering if it could possibly look similar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor