ka46
Mechanical
- Feb 26, 2013
- 3
Hi!!
I am currently running static analysis of bone constructs with a bone plates attached. I have done axial loading static analysis and results were in agreement with the experiments that my team has carried out. However, using the same model, the results by Abaqus deviates significantly from that of experiment. We wanted to study the displacements and stresses experienced by the system with the use of the bone plate to repair bone fractures. Experiments were verified to be in accordance to relevant procedures.
Would like to ask whether if the following loading/boundary conditions and contact types that I have used are correct.
Link to download pictures of my model
Link
Contact used:
[ul]
[li]I have split the model into half and re-merged them in Abaqus. I merged the screw heads with the holes of the bone plate to simulate bonded contact with the screw plate.[/li]
[li]I have also merged the bottom of the screws with the far side of the bone to simulate bonded contact.[/li]
[li]The bone parts are merged to simulate them as a single half[/li]
[li]The near side where the middle section of screw is in contact with the holes drilled in the bone, Hard Contact was used to simulate non-bonded contact[/li]
[li]Tangential Frictionless contact between the plate and bone surface as friction is considered to be insignificant[/li]
[/ul]
Constraints:
[ul]
[li]I have used Tie Constraints to tie the top and bottom half of the screws as well as the bone so as to simulate them as a single piece.[/li]
[/ul]
Force and Boundary Conditions
[ul]
[li]For Axial loading, I restrained one side in all directions and applied concentrated load on the other side[/li]
[li]For 4 point bending, I restrained one support (3 nodes) in all directions and the other support (3 nodes) in Y and Z direction. The concentrated loads were applied at 2 different locations (3 nodes each) marked by the boundaries on the model.[/li]
[/ul]
Mesh
[ul]
[li]A mesh of seed size 5 were used. Quadratic Tet was used throughout the model.[/li]
[/ul]
Thanks in advance for any comments on this.
I am currently running static analysis of bone constructs with a bone plates attached. I have done axial loading static analysis and results were in agreement with the experiments that my team has carried out. However, using the same model, the results by Abaqus deviates significantly from that of experiment. We wanted to study the displacements and stresses experienced by the system with the use of the bone plate to repair bone fractures. Experiments were verified to be in accordance to relevant procedures.
Would like to ask whether if the following loading/boundary conditions and contact types that I have used are correct.
Link to download pictures of my model
Link
Contact used:
[ul]
[li]I have split the model into half and re-merged them in Abaqus. I merged the screw heads with the holes of the bone plate to simulate bonded contact with the screw plate.[/li]
[li]I have also merged the bottom of the screws with the far side of the bone to simulate bonded contact.[/li]
[li]The bone parts are merged to simulate them as a single half[/li]
[li]The near side where the middle section of screw is in contact with the holes drilled in the bone, Hard Contact was used to simulate non-bonded contact[/li]
[li]Tangential Frictionless contact between the plate and bone surface as friction is considered to be insignificant[/li]
[/ul]
Constraints:
[ul]
[li]I have used Tie Constraints to tie the top and bottom half of the screws as well as the bone so as to simulate them as a single piece.[/li]
[/ul]
Force and Boundary Conditions
[ul]
[li]For Axial loading, I restrained one side in all directions and applied concentrated load on the other side[/li]
[li]For 4 point bending, I restrained one support (3 nodes) in all directions and the other support (3 nodes) in Y and Z direction. The concentrated loads were applied at 2 different locations (3 nodes each) marked by the boundaries on the model.[/li]
[/ul]
Mesh
[ul]
[li]A mesh of seed size 5 were used. Quadratic Tet was used throughout the model.[/li]
[/ul]
Thanks in advance for any comments on this.