Cagliostro84
Chemical
- Jul 9, 2019
- 3
Good afternoon,
I'm analyzing a case of protection from overpressure due to external fire, for a vessel cointaining high-boiling point liquid. PSV does not prevent vessel to collapse due to overheating, as set pressure would be reached only for temperatures higher than maximum allowable for the material (carbon steel).
So I'm evaluating to install a fail-to-open thermal fusible link valve in the bottom head of the vessel, to remove the inventory from the vessel when external fire starts and safely discharging the liquid to a collecting system when its temperature is still near ambient.
Valve body is certified as SIL-3, while the fusible link cannot be certified, and this is creating some concern about the reliability of the system.
I'm not an expert on SIL certification, but as far as I know SIL certificates are relevant only to instrumented system, not to mechanical ones (e.g. PSV, rupture disk, etc. are SIL certified?).
Does anybody have some experience on similar issues?
Thank you!
I'm analyzing a case of protection from overpressure due to external fire, for a vessel cointaining high-boiling point liquid. PSV does not prevent vessel to collapse due to overheating, as set pressure would be reached only for temperatures higher than maximum allowable for the material (carbon steel).
So I'm evaluating to install a fail-to-open thermal fusible link valve in the bottom head of the vessel, to remove the inventory from the vessel when external fire starts and safely discharging the liquid to a collecting system when its temperature is still near ambient.
Valve body is certified as SIL-3, while the fusible link cannot be certified, and this is creating some concern about the reliability of the system.
I'm not an expert on SIL certification, but as far as I know SIL certificates are relevant only to instrumented system, not to mechanical ones (e.g. PSV, rupture disk, etc. are SIL certified?).
Does anybody have some experience on similar issues?
Thank you!