Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Historic Caisson Construction Methods

Status
Not open for further replies.

tmacattack

Structural
Sep 7, 2005
10
I am currently working on a project in Chicago in which we are trying to determine the capacity the existing foundations. The 10-story building was built in 1911 and one was on of the first reinf concrete buildings. It was discovered that the foundations are concrete caissons. It was also determined that the caissons do not go down to bedrock, but rsst on clay 60 feet below grade.

Given the caisson shaft diameter at the basement level, it appears the diameter is not wide enough to support the building. My question is........in 1911, were they physically able to form bells or some sort of stepped foundation at the base of the caisson to spread the load on the clay? Or did the shaft get wider, as it went deeper?

Are there any historic resources that would discuss caisson construction from this era? Your help would be much appreciated. Thanks.

Terry
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I worked for a structural firm in south Texas some years ago - the founder had helped develop drilled and belled piers with the assistance of Terzahgi - they even had an autographed Terzahgi book in their library -

But I remember looking through some old boxes of photos and I remember there was a photo of four guys sitting at a card table, smoking and playing cards. The cool thing was, they were at the bottom of a pier shaft that was belled out quite wide. I think the photo was taken some time between 1920 and 1930.

I know this doesn't align with your 1911, but they did bell out piers back then, by hand labor - sounds quite dangerous - but in south Texas they have lots of highly plastic clay above a blue shale. So I guess the bells were stable enough.

 
I would check out Tschebotarioff's 1951 edition. He explains the "Chicago Method". "The Chicao caisson is used in clays of at least medium stiffness so that the wall of the cylindrical excagftion shaft will stand up vertically to a distance L,which is usually made equal to 5 to 6 ft. The caisson is made of sufficient width to permit a man to work in it. The walls of the shaft section are then lined with vertical planks, a few inches shorter than L, and are supported laterally by two pairs of steel half rings wedged apart and thus pressed against the timber lining. In this manner, the caisson can be carried down step by step to hardpan or to rock." Hardpan is the glaical clayey silt till. It is thus likely your method of construction and also the fact that the piles are in the stiff clay to hardpan. He suggests you see Dunham's book on Foundations of Structures.
Also see other "old" books - Krynine and Judd's book (1957). Also see Tomlinson's book - especially the earlier editions. He has great chapters on well and caisson foundations (box bridge ones). I would also do checking in the older Engineering News-Records - they have had a lot of good info when I was researching a project from 1916.
[cheers]
 
I might add, you might call Dr. J. Osterberg who is professor emeritus from Northwestern. He would know all you would ever need to know.
 
Thanks for the input. After further testing, the caissons go down to bedrock and we have plenty of capacity.

After exposing the top of the caisson in the basement, the original vertical wood plank forms were found, as was described above in the "Chicago Method." Very interesting stuff!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor