Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Holes in a roof beam. What is the purpose? 8

Status
Not open for further replies.

edison123

Electrical
Oct 23, 2002
4,425
I recently saw this roof beam with circular holes in an airport. What is the reason to cut out those holes? Reduce weight? Make it stiff?

WhatsApp_Image_2024-06-14_at_07.43.45_c7b3e217_zoh6td.jpg


Muthu
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I've seen this claim before and it's always struck me odd (2nd link above)

"Better strength and stability – their crenellated design makes castellated beams more resistant to bending and deformation."

I feel it should include the words "for the weight of the material that is used."

I recall seeing it as a way to take an I-beam from the rolling mill and convert it to a deeper beam using a trapezoidal zig-zag that is shifted and then welded along the middle at the tops of the trapezoids. It left them with hexagonal openings.

The bit with circular holes is wasting material that is cutout and discarded, but they have an interesting look and reduce installed weight, so why not?
 
Yes, round or hexagonal cut-outs and then anti corrosion painting the cut edges is a pita cost rider. May be resulting lighter beam reduces the column sizes and easier erection offsets the costs?

Wonder how the size and spacing of cut-outs is calculated.

Muthu
 
It's along the neutral axis so it has to resist the shear between the upper and lower portions.

I only did direct mechanical design, not regulated and codified structural design, so I'd ensure there was sufficient shear area and then divvy it up some interesting way. Same thing happens to main spars in aircraft wings - lots of holes. I would not be surprised if the standards have more to say on the subject.
 
3DDave said:
The bit with circular holes is wasting material that is cutout and discarded, but they have an interesting look and reduce installed weight, so why not?

Not as much wastage as you might think.

Manufacture-of-celular-and-castellated-beams-3_hfnuic.png
 
Edison
Good place for you sparkies to run stuff through, like in the photo you posted. More often pipes and ducts.

And then, some architects like the look.
 
hokie

lol, yes, us sparkies ruin the aesthetics with our works. I am planning a new 50 ft wide x 500 ft workshop and might go for this castellated beams design.


Retrograde

That seems like a lot of work driving up the cost, weld distortion etc. and finished product is not gonna be pleasing to the eyes.

Muthu
 
I don't believe they are used much these days, in Australia at least, (but I could be wrong) exactly because of edison123's comment.

They were popular in the 80's and 90's.
 
Increases the depth of the beam also. Blodgett has good chapter on them.
 
In an airport. It does look "aircrafty" :)

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
They should be stiffer than the source beam, if one ignores the holes.

There's a Best Buy in Hawai'i that has them as roof beams with a parking garage on top

Edit: its a single, it's not a garage. So an elevated parking lot that sits on a roof.
 
IRstuff

Yes, flanges weigh 40 to 50% of total. (Metric beam 125 to 600 depth).

Assuming 70% of the web is cut, that leaves a decent 30 to 40% weight reduction.



Muthu
 
Do they ever just cut a bunch of circles, as they do with regular beam penetrations? Or is it always cut and rewelded for material saving?
 
The parking isn't a garage per se it's a single level on the roof.

Edison, it's not typically done that way, they cut the beam mid depth then weld it back together to make a deeper beam with the holes in the new midline. See the figure above.

Now, that photograph above, I'm not convinced that's a standard castellated beam. that looks like what you describe, straight up cut out holes.

3ddave, I think the comment is accurate, within the context of creating a larger moment of inertia (potentially larger strength as the flanges are farther from the centroid, provided shear in the web doesn't govern), and increasing the effective stiffness for the same weight (deflection)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor