direwolf11
Aerospace
- Sep 19, 2022
- 1
I investigate the dynamic behavior of a shell model in Abaqus (see appendix "03" for schematic system setup, all values in SI unities), which is connected to a spring-damper system.
Abstract of the model:
- Modal analysis + SSD solver (steady state dynamics)
- Material model: Composite material layup (see appendix "04")
- Mesh: S4R shell elements
- Connector Assignment realized by stiffness and damping connection (see appendix "02")
- Excitation via primary base motion (displacement)
Short Problem overview:
If a small stiffness is attributed to the interface (appendix 02), then the displacement of the nodes of the shell follows as in appendix 01.
As soon as the stiffness exceeds a certain value (appendix 06), the displacement of the nodes is 20x larger and
has no phase change at the resonance point. This seems physically unacceptable.
Does this point to a numerical problem that occurs at low stiffnesses in the connector?
How can the solution behavior of Abaqus be understood more precisely at this point?
Abstract of the model:
- Modal analysis + SSD solver (steady state dynamics)
- Material model: Composite material layup (see appendix "04")
- Mesh: S4R shell elements
- Connector Assignment realized by stiffness and damping connection (see appendix "02")
- Excitation via primary base motion (displacement)
Short Problem overview:
If a small stiffness is attributed to the interface (appendix 02), then the displacement of the nodes of the shell follows as in appendix 01.
As soon as the stiffness exceeds a certain value (appendix 06), the displacement of the nodes is 20x larger and
has no phase change at the resonance point. This seems physically unacceptable.
Does this point to a numerical problem that occurs at low stiffnesses in the connector?
How can the solution behavior of Abaqus be understood more precisely at this point?