jason85
Aerospace
- Oct 23, 2013
- 1
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to confirm some experimental heat transfer data on a flat plate using the Van Driest methods. I'm currently reading through Van Driest's "The Problem of Aerodynamic Heating", where he basically adapts Newton's law of cooling, step by step, to a flat plate heating solution for laminar flow (he does the same for turbulent as well).
Anyway, for the laminar solution he provides a constant recovery factor but doesn't really talk about how he got the Stanton Numbers that are plotted in Figure 6/7/8. He only cites the Eber (1952) paper, which as far as I can tell only really provides some recovery factors, nothing about Stanton numbers. It does however provide Nusselt numbers for cylinders and cones; not really sure if that's relevant.
How else does one use the Van Driest methods for laminar flat plate heating approximations, since Van Driest in his paper only really seems to supply the recovery factor, not the Stanton number (well, he does provide it in Figure 6 but an equation would have been nice!).
Any ideas?
I'm trying to confirm some experimental heat transfer data on a flat plate using the Van Driest methods. I'm currently reading through Van Driest's "The Problem of Aerodynamic Heating", where he basically adapts Newton's law of cooling, step by step, to a flat plate heating solution for laminar flow (he does the same for turbulent as well).
Anyway, for the laminar solution he provides a constant recovery factor but doesn't really talk about how he got the Stanton Numbers that are plotted in Figure 6/7/8. He only cites the Eber (1952) paper, which as far as I can tell only really provides some recovery factors, nothing about Stanton numbers. It does however provide Nusselt numbers for cylinders and cones; not really sure if that's relevant.
How else does one use the Van Driest methods for laminar flat plate heating approximations, since Van Driest in his paper only really seems to supply the recovery factor, not the Stanton number (well, he does provide it in Figure 6 but an equation would have been nice!).
Any ideas?