Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction? 6

Status
Not open for further replies.

knowlittle

Materials
Jul 26, 2007
192
0
0
US
I need to cool a 200 mm square aluminum plate, 10 mm thick to 25 deg C. Test duration is 24 hours. This plate is getting constant radiation heat from underneath, about 20W. What I plan to do is to fabricate a cold plate and place it on the subject plate. The cold plate will have copper tubing embedded on the surface, and water will flow through the copper. I will flip it over and place it on the subject plate. Now the subject plate will directly contact copper tubing with water flowing inside.

Is there an easy way to improve metal to metal contact?
Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

According to this calculator, 20mm is slightly, about 10% better than 10mm

TTFN
faq731-376
7ofakss

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529
 
For the direct path, yes, but for the points directly in the middle, that might not be incorrect. Just imagine that the copper was paper-thin. The thermal resistance from the middle would be infinitely larger, and the heat would have to flow laterally in the aluminum to get to the coolant tubes. Therefore, there is an optimum thickness that balances the reduction in spreading resistance with the increase in the direct resistance. In either case, this particular example's low power makes it a bit moot. The thermal resistance is very low in any case, and if the calculator is correct, even a 1-mm copper thickness would be adequate.

The link I gave is not right; it should be
TTFN
faq731-376
7ofakss

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529
 
I understand your explanation. My resoning is that we already have 10mm of aluminum, which is heated from the underside. Therefore the temperature distribution is already adjusted somewhat on the top surface. Is 10mm enough? I'm not sure but I have a feeling that it is. I'm interested to find out and I may try to solve it on the weekend.
 
Let's assume he had lots more money, or a LOT more heat to get rid of from his plate-attached-to-a-vacuum chamber-that-needs-cooling.

If he machined his tube holes "inside of" the Al plate so that there were water flow paths inside of a thick AL or Cu plate, rather than on top of the thin plate and only touching at the tangents , then wouldn't he get the best heat transfer rate.

Noe, he'd need a head at each end of the thick heat exchanger plate, and those two head - like any heat exchanger would need to be screwed onto the sides of the thick plate, so he'd have more machining and assembly cost.....
 
Racook, I don't understand what you mean. I don't want to seem mean or anything..... I just don't get it. I'd like further explanation of your point.

Thanks.
 
If he machined his tube holes "inside of" the Al plate so that there were water flow paths inside of a thick AL or Cu plate, rather than on top of the thin plate and only touching at the tangents , then wouldn't he get the best heat transfer rate.


Not necessarily. I had assumed that the tubes were brazed to the copper plate, so there's a plausibly solid thermal path from the plate to the coolant.

TTFN
faq731-376
7ofakss

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top