Luke720
Materials
- Mar 26, 2013
- 14
Hello Everyone!
I am in need of some help, I am modeling a sphere impacting a surface (both deformable metals) at a high velocity. Upon impact both the sphere and substrate deform significantly. Additionally I am using element failure and deletion which require internal surfaces.
When I set the interaction properties such that the particle impacts, deforms and rebounds everything works fine. The problem arises when I turn on the cohesive behavior interaction property.
When cohesive behavior is enabled I see severe surface penetration of both surfaces into one another. I have tried to do matching surface definitions so that each surface is defined as the master in one definition and the slave in another, but it hasn't worked (I am using general contact but cohesive surface behavior forces a master-slave interaction).
Here are a few images to illustrate the issue < > *I have tried this with much finer mesh and without using planes of symmetry as shown in this example
Some other things I have tried:
- Using a large linear contact stiffness rather than "Hard" contact
- refining the mesh
- using a smaller mesh on the slave surface
Let me know if I was unclear with my problem description or if there is any additional information that may help.
This problem is really bugging me and I cannot seem to figure it out. If anybody has any advice or ideas that I could try I would be very, very grateful.
Luke
I am in need of some help, I am modeling a sphere impacting a surface (both deformable metals) at a high velocity. Upon impact both the sphere and substrate deform significantly. Additionally I am using element failure and deletion which require internal surfaces.
When I set the interaction properties such that the particle impacts, deforms and rebounds everything works fine. The problem arises when I turn on the cohesive behavior interaction property.
When cohesive behavior is enabled I see severe surface penetration of both surfaces into one another. I have tried to do matching surface definitions so that each surface is defined as the master in one definition and the slave in another, but it hasn't worked (I am using general contact but cohesive surface behavior forces a master-slave interaction).
Here are a few images to illustrate the issue < > *I have tried this with much finer mesh and without using planes of symmetry as shown in this example
Some other things I have tried:
- Using a large linear contact stiffness rather than "Hard" contact
- refining the mesh
- using a smaller mesh on the slave surface
Let me know if I was unclear with my problem description or if there is any additional information that may help.
This problem is really bugging me and I cannot seem to figure it out. If anybody has any advice or ideas that I could try I would be very, very grateful.
Luke