M MOTAAL
Structural
- Aug 22, 2018
- 22
Hi everybody. I have a quasi static problem that I need to use mass scaling to increase the stable time increment and it's the first time i use mass scaling. I used two mass scaling factors as I followed a strategy in assigning mass scaling factor to selective element sets with larger value of scaling factor (200) for the those elements with smaller stable time increment than 1e-5 and another value (150) of the same factor for the rest of the model elements.
Taking mass scaling factors in consideration made the expenses of computations much lesser. But I have some worries about the results. How can I judge the results is the issue. I have been surfing the net but I didn't find much about this topic. Some of the few results while searching, was talking about some criteria through which I can accept the results of the model after applying mass scaling. They mentioned that total energy must be constant and for quasi static in particular, and has to equal zero or a value close to zero. But I can find the words "close to zero" are very ambiguous. In my model the total energy was constant but equal to (0.225) my units are in N and mm. I also found another criterion related to kinetic and internal energy. It states that the kinetic energy has not to increase more than a ratio from Internal Energy equals to 5%.
My questions are:
a) Is the value of 0.225 for total energy for quasi static in my model accepted?
b) Is there anyway to judge mass scaling factor or making an initial gesture of it's value?
c) Do anybody has a reference in this topic that I can depend on in this topic?
d) What kind of effect may result from assigning more than mass scaling factor in the same model on selective set basis? has anybody tried it before?
Thank you in advance.
Taking mass scaling factors in consideration made the expenses of computations much lesser. But I have some worries about the results. How can I judge the results is the issue. I have been surfing the net but I didn't find much about this topic. Some of the few results while searching, was talking about some criteria through which I can accept the results of the model after applying mass scaling. They mentioned that total energy must be constant and for quasi static in particular, and has to equal zero or a value close to zero. But I can find the words "close to zero" are very ambiguous. In my model the total energy was constant but equal to (0.225) my units are in N and mm. I also found another criterion related to kinetic and internal energy. It states that the kinetic energy has not to increase more than a ratio from Internal Energy equals to 5%.
My questions are:
a) Is the value of 0.225 for total energy for quasi static in my model accepted?
b) Is there anyway to judge mass scaling factor or making an initial gesture of it's value?
c) Do anybody has a reference in this topic that I can depend on in this topic?
d) What kind of effect may result from assigning more than mass scaling factor in the same model on selective set basis? has anybody tried it before?
Thank you in advance.