gtsurfbum
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 15, 2011
- 7
Hello all,
I am a civil engineer with about 4 years of experience in road and civil/site design. I began work with a firm about 10 months ago, and there have been several times when things came up that bothered me. I won't go into great detail, but I can describe what has been going on here lately that I don't agree with.
Our client is an oil and gas company who wishes to widen a road and bridge, to make way for a drill rig. The client (from what my boss says) has been open about the fact that they have not been in contact with the land owners. Their approach is to build it, and then work out an agreement later with the land owners. I am fairly certain that the bridge is on private land. Also, apparently they do their own construction (but not their own design?).
Since working on the project, my designs have been what I consider BMP. These designs are basic, mostly extending the road surfaces to the edge of ROW. And then showing on plans how the vehicle could make it across by making a 3pt turn. My goal was to avoid the environmental issues that arise from doing construction in the creek.
The client is convinced that they are allowed to place box culverts in creeks (and then drive over them, regardless of weight limits) because they have done so in the past. Also, my boss (who is not a PE, but parters with a PE from another firm) agrees with anything the client suggests.
Now, from what I understand, any design is just intellectual property. And doing so is perfectly legal. However, I don't agree with the project or the client's suggestions for design. I get along great with my boss, I just don't agree with the way he handles business, and there isn't really any expertise available that I can rely on for design issues.
We are a small firm so if you're wondering about the organizational structure ...it goes --- Client - Boss - Me
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
gtsurfbum
I am a civil engineer with about 4 years of experience in road and civil/site design. I began work with a firm about 10 months ago, and there have been several times when things came up that bothered me. I won't go into great detail, but I can describe what has been going on here lately that I don't agree with.
Our client is an oil and gas company who wishes to widen a road and bridge, to make way for a drill rig. The client (from what my boss says) has been open about the fact that they have not been in contact with the land owners. Their approach is to build it, and then work out an agreement later with the land owners. I am fairly certain that the bridge is on private land. Also, apparently they do their own construction (but not their own design?).
Since working on the project, my designs have been what I consider BMP. These designs are basic, mostly extending the road surfaces to the edge of ROW. And then showing on plans how the vehicle could make it across by making a 3pt turn. My goal was to avoid the environmental issues that arise from doing construction in the creek.
The client is convinced that they are allowed to place box culverts in creeks (and then drive over them, regardless of weight limits) because they have done so in the past. Also, my boss (who is not a PE, but parters with a PE from another firm) agrees with anything the client suggests.
Now, from what I understand, any design is just intellectual property. And doing so is perfectly legal. However, I don't agree with the project or the client's suggestions for design. I get along great with my boss, I just don't agree with the way he handles business, and there isn't really any expertise available that I can rely on for design issues.
We are a small firm so if you're wondering about the organizational structure ...it goes --- Client - Boss - Me
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
gtsurfbum