Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

I have a Countmeasures Co

Thread starter 855
Start date Sep 25, 2002

Status: Not open for further replies.

Sep 25, 2002

855

Aerospace

I have a Countmeasures Computer power supply whose part number is 1874AS7200 made by Raytheon, its failure rate is 83.36. Raytheon has another proposed power supply whose part number is 1874AS7300 whose failure rate is 93.31. For the one whose part number is 1874AS7300 Raytheon used the "Brick Technology".
I need to know :
1) Why the failure rate for this one is almost 10 more than the other one.
2) Which one is better and why.
3) What is I "Brick Technology" and what is the benifit of its use.
If you have any information please let me know.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Mrinal Saha
SahaM@navair.navy.mil