Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Impedance Ratios for Ultrasonic Thickness Testing 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Derek57

Aerospace
Jul 2, 2009
12
Is there a general rule of thumb for impedance ratios of different materials for UT? My question is if I have a UT meter that is calibrated to a carbon steel cal block, can I expect reasonable results if the material to be examined is copper? The impedance ratio of steel to copper is 1.4.

Thank you for any input, it is appreciated.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Adjust your meter for the velocity of sound through copper, table of materials below, copper 4700 m/s. Unfortunately if you are sizing flaws, you are going to need a calibration block of copper with known indications of a certain size, becasue as you mention the impendence ratio is different for copper (different size/structure grains), and the same flaw in these materials won't show exactly the same response on the meter.

Material Metres/second
Air 330
Aluminium 6300
Alumina Oxide 9900
Beryllium 12900
Boron Carbide 11000
Brass 4300
Cadmium 2800
Copper 4700
Glass(crown) 5300
Glycerine 1900
Gold 3200
Ice 4000
Inconel 5700
Iron 5900
Iron (cast) 4600
Lead 2200
Magnesium 5800
Mercury 1400
Molybdenum 6300
Monel 5400
Neoprene 1600
Nickel 5600
Nylon, 6.6 2600
Oil (SAE 30) 1700
Platinum 3300
Plexiglas 1700
Polyethylene 1900
Polystyrene 2400
Polyurethane 1900
Quartz 5800
Rubber, Butyl 1800
Silver 3600
Steel, Mild 5920
Steel, Stainless 5800
Teflon 1400
Tin 3300
Titanium 6100
Tungsten 5200
Uranium 3400
Water 1480
Zinc 4200
 
Thank you very much; however, would thickness measurements be adversely affected (and to what degree) if the unit was calibrated to steel?

For example, would a thickness reading on the UT meter of the copper piping at 0.120 inches be somewhat close, or just way off? The relative flaw size makes perfect sense though.
 
Not if you can adjust your meter for the velocity in copper (which even the most basic meters can do) and take the reading. If your meter was functining perfectly, you would get a correct reading, although you cannot use the steel block anymore to calibrate. If you have a piece of copper, you can measure the thickness with a ruler and use this as a calibration piece.
 
Thank you,

That was my concern, the meter was calibrated to steel then used to measure thickness for copper (unfortunately, this already occurred).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor