Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Influence Line for Trucks 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

dlawrence529

Geotechnical
Sep 17, 2015
23
I'm working on a work trestle for an upcoming bridge construction project. The contractor would like to back trucks with bridge beams onto the trestle for unloading. The truck/trailer/load will be +/- 140 kips on 6 axles. The trestle beams are simply supported spans. I'm trying to do this by hand, but it's quickly becoming a bookkeeping nightmare.

Is there a simple (preferably free or cheap) program that can create/analyze influence diagrams for beams?

Are there any assumptions that can be made to simplify the hand calculations? For example, is it common practice to create an influence lines at quarter points of the trestle beams rather than 1 ft increments across the beam?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The influence lines (shear and moment) are just triangles for simple spans, but I wouldn't use influence lines to solve this problem.

Place the wheel nearest the center of gravity at midspan and solve for moment.
 
For a simple span, you don't need influence lines. (That is for continuous spans.) AASHTO has a table that gives max. shear & moments for simple spans based on load spec (i.e. H20, etc). AISC also has a shear/moment max. equation for a multi-axial vehicle on a simple span beam.
 
Yes, if your trucks are legal loads (e.g. HS-20) or can only put two axles on a span at any time (which is typical, it's uncommon to have long span trestles), I'd go with WARose's method.

If not, use a beam analysis software with some educated guess-and-check placement (or moving load analysis if available).

----
The name is a long story -- just call me Lo.
 
You don't need to do a moving load analysis for simply supported spans, but if you have a non-standard load with 6 axles (as stated in the OP) it makes life easier, and it allows you to see what is going on more clearly, so I'm not sure why people want to avoid doing it.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
 
Sorry, I must have missed the truck information in the first post. I'm not opposed to moving load analysis if you have the tool. It sounds like OP might not have software capable of it right now.

(Also, some of my inherent bias against the "let the computer solve everything" trend is seeping in).

----
The name is a long story -- just call me Lo.
 
Sorry, I must have missed the truck information in the first post. I'm not opposed to moving load analysis if you have the tool. It sounds like OP might not have software capable of it right now.

He does if he followed the link in my first post in this thread.




Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
 
Thanks for all the responses. I looked into RISA 2D for the moving load analysis, but unfortunately RISA has moved to a yearly subscription license. I don't think I would use it enough to justify a yearly expense. The trend of moving toward yearly subscriptions for program licenses is becoming very frustrating.

I tried looking into AASHTO and AISC, but it seemed like the diagrams are geared toward specific loading or multispan beams. I don't deal with moving loads very much, so maybe I'm just having trouble applying them to my scenario.

Thanks IDS for the excel workbook. This looks like it is exactly what I need. Hopefully I will have some time to dive into it this morning
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor