victa1288
Electrical
- Apr 18, 2006
- 48
Hi,
I have a tricky question. When we do the realy coordiantion, we always expect the protective device can operate at less than the minimum short circuit, like L-L faul.
In my case, I am using an extremely inverse curve to protect against Minimum fault to max. fault, when the fault increases to a higher level, I want the instaneous element to operate.But this setting should be less than the available maxmum fault current and higher than the max. fault at the downstream.
The problem is, the fault level at the downstream is slightly less than the fault level. It looks like, the only thing I can do to achieve the coordiantion is to delay the ins. tripping of upstream device. Is it Ok when the fault level is close to max. fault level?
I checked the cable damage curve, the cable can be protected at the max.fault level.
I can't set the Ins. too low, because there would be a miscordiantion with downstream fuse.
Thank you for your valuable inputs.
I have a tricky question. When we do the realy coordiantion, we always expect the protective device can operate at less than the minimum short circuit, like L-L faul.
In my case, I am using an extremely inverse curve to protect against Minimum fault to max. fault, when the fault increases to a higher level, I want the instaneous element to operate.But this setting should be less than the available maxmum fault current and higher than the max. fault at the downstream.
The problem is, the fault level at the downstream is slightly less than the fault level. It looks like, the only thing I can do to achieve the coordiantion is to delay the ins. tripping of upstream device. Is it Ok when the fault level is close to max. fault level?
I checked the cable damage curve, the cable can be protected at the max.fault level.
I can't set the Ins. too low, because there would be a miscordiantion with downstream fuse.
Thank you for your valuable inputs.