KootK
Structural
- Oct 16, 2001
- 18,563
It seems to me that, where a concrete column is transferred out at transfer slab, there should be integrity steel beneath the column just like at regular slab/column joints. And for the same reason: a fail safe in case of a punching shear failure. In fact, I feel a greater need for integrity reinforcing at transfer slabs because the stakes are so much higher.
Normally, integrity steel is placed at the bottom of slabs. There's a sketch and some commentary in CSA that explains why. My thinking is that integrity steel beneath a transferred column should actually be at the top of the transfer slab. After all, a transferred column at a transfer slab looks much like an upside down, heavily loaded, roof slab.
So my questions are two fold:
1) Are others including integrity reinforcing beneath transferred columns?
2) If you are including integrity steel, are you placing it at the top of the slabs?
I guess whether or not integrity steel could actually deal with the loads imposed by a transferred column is another story. Unfortunately, increasing slab depth doesn't improve matters for integrity steel.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
Normally, integrity steel is placed at the bottom of slabs. There's a sketch and some commentary in CSA that explains why. My thinking is that integrity steel beneath a transferred column should actually be at the top of the transfer slab. After all, a transferred column at a transfer slab looks much like an upside down, heavily loaded, roof slab.
So my questions are two fold:
1) Are others including integrity reinforcing beneath transferred columns?
2) If you are including integrity steel, are you placing it at the top of the slabs?
I guess whether or not integrity steel could actually deal with the loads imposed by a transferred column is another story. Unfortunately, increasing slab depth doesn't improve matters for integrity steel.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.