Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Intellisolve's Hydraflow VS Engenious StormSHED 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

kswanson

Civil/Environmental
Mar 6, 2008
8
Hi, I need to get this situation resolved. I need to verify a stormwater conveyance analysis and I'm puzzled as to why the two models provide different flow capacity values. A consultant provided me a Hydraflow conveyance model that shows "Cap Full" (Capacity Full I presume?) values are substantially larger than "Full Q" values I modeled in StormSHED. The Q values that actually flow through each reach are very close for both programs, but the max capacity values dictate whether or not the conveyance model passes the design criteria. His model passes because his capacity values are so high that it will never overtop, but my StormSHED model says that it fails because my capacity values are much lower. Here are the capacity values for each reach.
StormSHED (cfs) Hydraflow (cfs)
17.74 32.65
11.45 25.34
6.28 5.25
2.9 5.33
6.4 5.35
3.25 7.54
3.68 6.74

It was brought to my attention that StormSHED is a gravity- based program so when it computes pipe full capacity, it's based on gravity, not some surcharge. How does Hydraflow compute "Cap Full" values? I don't have a copy of the program so I can't research it. Thanks so much for your time.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I did mislabel the StormSHED and Hydraflow columns. Thanks for pointing that out to me. The labels need to be switched. And yes, the reports do indicate that the pipe is 36" diameter. I had to retype the information in Word, so mistakes do happen. It would be nice to have both a hard copy and a digital copy of the report so I could copy and paste the data into Word.

It would be nice to find out why the Full Q and Cap Full values differ so much with both programs. Any ideas as to why this happened?
 
Stormshed accounts for tailwater conditions, as I recall, which would yield lower pipe capacities than free-flowing pipe outlets - especially since you have some very flat pipes (S<0.5%)
 
I read in the Civil 3D stormwater discussion group that Hydraflow recently updated it's modeling of pipe flow. I would check that forum, because people were getting different flows even between version of Hydraflow.

Michael
Import Hydraflow Into Excel
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor