Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Intepretation of Table from Fig 3.2 AWS D1.1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Melas85

Marine/Ocean
Nov 21, 2013
10
0
0
SG
thread178-318510

Hi,

I have been looking at this forum for almost 2 years. It has answers me with lots of question during my course of career and I really like to thank this forum for helping me along the way

Anyway to start of with. I am just wondering referring to Fig. 3.2 from AWS D1.1, What is the E stands for? Effective throat or effective weld length axis?

Another question is. I have a tubular(WT=19.1 mm) to plate(THK-12mm) fillet weld similar to Fig.3.2 . The design drawings I received shown that is has to be 8 mm fillet welds. However could someone guide me on how to use the Table present at Fig 3.2?

Greatly appreciate if someone could reply.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I reckon it is the effective throat as defined in 2.24.1.3 (2004 ed).

As far as your example, the thinnest part is 12 mm, the pwps would require a minimum leg length of 12 mm, and given your contact size of 8 mm, an economic decision would be required in qualifying the contract weld size of 8 mm or using 12 mm providing you have approval from the Engineer (client). Keep us posted on your final outcome.
 
The quoted sizes: Effective throat of 8; Leg Length of 12
are the same size. Assuming an angle of 90°, the ratio of Throat to Leg is 1.414 : 1
8 x 1.414 = 11.3128 = 12

Thus, to obtain a throat of 8, the minimum gauged leg size must be 12.
 
bernoullies123 - Thank you so much for the advice. Will update you once get the Client Update
Duwe6 - Thank you for the advise
denlow60 - Thank you for the advise

Sorry for late reply cause I was in millitary reservists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top